添加链接
link之家
链接快照平台
  • 输入网页链接,自动生成快照
  • 标签化管理网页链接
Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Learn more about Collectives

Teams

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Learn more about Teams

I am designing an app in electron, so I have access to CSS variables. I have defined a color variable in vars.css :

:root {
  --color: #f0f0f0;

I want to use this color in main.css, but with some opacity applied:

#element {
  background: (somehow use var(--color) at some opacity);

How would I go about doing this? I am not using any preprocessor, only CSS. I would prefer an all-CSS answer, but I will accept JavaScript/jQuery.

I cannot use opacity because I am using a background image that should not be transparent.

AHHHHH!!!!! This is so annoying! It's almost 2020 now. Color picker gets #hex colors. alpha / rgba doesn't work in Sass/Stylus - because it's not a rgb value. Should I put 4 sliders in my CMS for every single color? – sheriffderek Sep 5, 2019 at 20:17

You can't take an existing color value and apply an alpha channel to it. Namely, you can't take an existing hex value such as #f0f0f0, give it an alpha component and use the resulting value with another property.

However, custom properties allow you to convert your hex value into an RGB triplet for use with rgba(), store that value in the custom property (including the commas!), substitute that value using var() into an rgba() function with your desired alpha value, and it'll just work:

:root {
  /* #f0f0f0 in decimal RGB */
  --color: 240, 240, 240;
body {
  color: #000;
  background-color: #000;
#element {
  background-color: rgba(var(--color), 0.8);
<p id="element">If you can see this, your browser supports custom properties.</p>

This seems almost too good to be true.1 How does it work?

The magic lies in the fact that the values of custom properties are substituted as is when replacing var() references in a property value, before that property's value is computed. This means that as far as custom properties are concerned, the value of --color in your example isn't a color value at all until a var(--color) expression appears somewhere that expects a color value (and only in that context). From section 2.1 of the css-variables spec:

The allowed syntax for custom properties is extremely permissive. The <declaration-value> production matches any sequence of one or more tokens, so long as the sequence does not contain <bad-string-token>, <bad-url-token>, unmatched <)-token>, <]-token>, or <}-token>, or top-level <semicolon-token> tokens or <delim-token> tokens with a value of "!".

For example, the following is a valid custom property:

--foo: if(x > 5) this.width = 10;

While this value is obviously useless as a variable, as it would be invalid in any normal property, it might be read and acted on by JavaScript.

And section 3:

If a property contains one or more var() functions, and those functions are syntactically valid, the entire property’s grammar must be assumed to be valid at parse time. It is only syntax-checked at computed-value time, after var() functions have been substituted.

This means that the 240, 240, 240 value you see above gets substituted directly into the rgba() function before the declaration is computed. So this:

#element {
  background-color: rgba(var(--color), 0.8);

which doesn't appear to be valid CSS at first because rgba() expects no less than four comma-separated numeric values, becomes this:

#element {
  background-color: rgba(240, 240, 240, 0.8);

which, of course, is perfectly valid CSS.

Taking it one step further, you can store the alpha component in its own custom property:

:root {
  --color: 240, 240, 240;
  --alpha: 0.8;

and substitute it, with the same result:

#element {
  background-color: rgba(var(--color), var(--alpha));

This allows you to have different alpha values that you can swap around on-the-fly.

1 Well, it is, if you're running the code snippet in a browser that doesn't support custom properties.

Unfortunately, the value "240, 240, 240" is not editable with a color picker. That is a huge miss when you need to find the right colors for your GUI. – GetFree Sep 16, 2017 at 7:43 rgba() is nowadays a synonym for rgb() so you can use color: rgb(var(--color), .4). But the reason I found this SOQ is because the following doesn't work: :root { --hex-color: "#333333"; } element { background: var(--hex-color)99 /*this should be alpha 60%*/ }, but somehow the two strings are not joined into #33333399 which would work. – s3c Feb 17, 2020 at 10:10 @s3c The syntax var(--hex-color)99 is converted to two tokens #333333 99 (notice the space to separate tokens) which obviously is not the thing you want. Custom properties were originally defined to copy tokens, not strings and this is the end result. It's way too late to fix this now. – Mikko Rantalainen Feb 19, 2020 at 6:43 @s3c: The good news is that CSS Color 5 is introducing some cool new functions to manipulate existing hex values, including changing their alpha channel: drafts.csswg.org/css-color-5/#colormodify – BoltClock Mar 10, 2020 at 3:17

Relative color syntax

With this new CSS ability (css-color-5) which allows color format transformations, it also will also allow adding opacity to any color in any format, for example, to RGB (relative transformations can be done to any other format):

html { --color: blue }
.with-opacity { background: rgb(from var(--color) r g b / 50%) }

(As of writing, not yet available in browsers. Will update once arrives)

👉 Codepen demo

This can't come soon enough. Its like the people who make the spec never make actual websites, where there are themes and effects, linked to a certain color. – run_the_race Oct 27, 2022 at 19:39 Another related game changer for color themes is contrast-color, will be so great once they are adopted. – run_the_race Oct 31, 2022 at 9:05 is there a link to caniuse.com for this? Please update the answer with this info if available – Dmitry Efimenko Jan 6 at 15:00

I know the OP isn't using a preprocessor, but I would have been helped if the following information was part of the answer here (I can't comment yet, otherwise I would have commented @BoltClock answer.

If you are using, e.g. scss, the answer above will fail, because scss attempts to compile the styles with a scss-specific rgba()/hsla() function, which requires 4 parameters. However, rgba()/hsla() are also native css functions, so you can use string interpolation to bypass the scss function.

Example (valid in sass 3.5.0+):

:root {
    --color_rgb: 250, 250, 250;
    --color_hsl: 250, 50%, 50%;
div {
    /* This is valid CSS, but will fail in a scss compilation */
    background-color: rgba(var(--color_rgb), 0.5);
    /* This is valid scss, and will generate the CSS above */
    background-color: #{'rgba(var(--color_rgb), 0.5)'};
<div></div>
If you prefer to use native CSS color functions in your Sass .scss files, you can include the following function definitions at the top of your file to override Sass' handling and make them pass through: @function rgb($args...) { @return #{'rgb(#{$args})'}; } @function rgba($args...) { @return #{'rgba(#{$args})'}; } @function hsl($args...) { @return #{'hsl(#{$args})'}; } @function hsla($args...) { @return #{'hsla(#{$args})'}; } ```` – lunelson Oct 16, 2018 at 11:32 rgba is a synonym for rgb for quite some time now.. You are hence allowed to drop the "a". – s3c Feb 19, 2020 at 8:14 Another workaround for scss files is to use uppercase (RGB) which is then ignored by sass. Eg: color: RGB(var(--color_rgb), 0.5);. From GitHub – Jono Job Apr 17, 2020 at 2:35 Nice answer! If you have already defined the colors in hex, you can simply add this code to convert it to the custom rgb properties: :root { @each $color, $value in $colors { --#{$color}_rgb: #{red($value), green($value), blue($value)}; } } – Torsten Kolb Jul 31, 2020 at 10:38

I was in a similar situation, but unfortunately the given solutions did not work for me, as the variables could be anything from rgb to hsl to hex or even color names.
I solved this issue now, by applying the background-color and the opacity to a pseudo :after or :before element:

.container {
    position: relative;
.container::before {
    content: "";
    width: 100%;
    height: 100%;
    position: absolute;
    left: 0;
    background-color: var(--color);
    opacity: 0.3;

The styles might need to be changed a little, depending on the element the background should be applied to.
Also it might not work for all situations, but hopefully it helps in some cases, where the other solutions can't be used.

Edit: I just noticed, that this solution obviously also impacts the text color, as it creates an element in front of the target element and applies a transparent background color to it.
This might be a problem in some cases.

This not only has the advantage of allowing more flexible specification of the color (e.g., a name, or rgb or HSL) but also avoids any conflict between native CSS color functions and Sass's color functions. See SimplyPhy's answer below. – Jim Ratliff Sep 6, 2019 at 7:34 I think it's better to use :before so you get the right stacking order without playing with z-index. – Mikko Rantalainen Feb 19, 2020 at 6:46 @MikkoRantalainen You'll still have to use z-index: -1 because positioned elements cover non-positioned by default. – EvgenKo423 Feb 21 at 6:58 @EvgenKo423 You're right that it must be considered. Because ::before is technically inside the .container it's rendered on top of the .container unless z-index is negative. However, if .container has elements with position: relative, those will be rendered above the ::before pseudo-element even with default z-index values. – Mikko Rantalainen Feb 21 at 10:20

If you use dark and light mode, i use this sample. I prefer separate between colors and rgb colors variable assignment. So i use two each loop. I realise this solution is not dry code. If you want to dry code could you use one loop.

$colors-light: (
  white: #fff,
  black: #0c0d0e,
  orange: #f48024,
  green: #5eba7d,
  blue: #0077cc,
  red: #d1383d,
  red-100: #e2474c,
  red-200: red,
$colors-dark: (
  black: #fff,
  white: #2d2d2d,
  orange: #dd7118,
  green: #5eba7d,
  blue: #0077cc,
  red: #aa1c21,
  red-100: #c9292e,
  red-200: red,
@function hexToRGB($hex) {
  @return red($hex), green($hex), blue($hex);
@mixin generate_colors($colors) {
  // Colors
  @each $color, $value in $colors {
    @if str-slice(#{$value}, 1, 1) == "#" {
      --#{$color}: #{$value};
    } @else {
      --#{$color}: var(--#{$value});
  // RGB Colors
  @each $color, $value in $colors {
    @if str-slice(#{$value}, 1, 1) == "#" {
      --RGB_#{$color}: #{hexToRGB($value)};
    } @else {
      --RGB_#{$color}: var(--RGB_#{$value});
:root {
  @include generate_colors($colors-light);
[data-theme="dark"] {
  @include generate_colors($colors-dark);

dry code

@mixin generate_colors($colors) {
  // Colors, RGB Colors
  @each $color, $value in $colors {
    @if str-slice(#{$value}, 1, 1) == "#" {
      --#{$color}: #{$value};
      --RGB_#{$color}: #{hexToRGB($value)};
    } @else {
      --#{$color}: var(--#{$value});
      --RGB_#{$color}: var(--RGB_#{$value});

css Output

:root {
  --white: #fff;
  --RGB_white: 255, 255, 255;
  --black: #0c0d0e;
  --RGB_black: 12, 13, 14;
  --orange: #f48024;
  --RGB_orange: 244, 128, 36;
  --green: #5eba7d;
  --RGB_green: 94, 186, 125;
  --blue: #0077cc;
  --RGB_blue: 0, 119, 204;
  --red: #d1383d;
  --RGB_red: 209, 56, 61;
  --red-100: #e2474c;
  --RGB_red-100: 226, 71, 76;
  --red-200: var(--red);
  --RGB_red-200: var(--RGB_red);
[data-theme="dark"] {
  --black: #fff;
  --RGB_black: 255, 255, 255;
  --white: #2d2d2d;
  --RGB_white: 45, 45, 45;
  --orange: #dd7118;
  --RGB_orange: 221, 113, 24;
  --green: #5eba7d;
  --RGB_green: 94, 186, 125;
  --blue: #0077cc;
  --RGB_blue: 0, 119, 204;
  --red: #aa1c21;
  --RGB_red: 170, 28, 33;
  --red-100: #c9292e;
  --RGB_red-100: 201, 41, 46;
  --red-200: var(--red);
  --RGB_red-200: var(--RGB_red);
body {
  background-color: var(--white);
.colors {
  display: -webkit-box;
  display: -ms-flexbox;
  display: flex;
  -webkit-box-orient: horizontal;
  -webkit-box-direction: normal;
      -ms-flex-direction: row;
          flex-direction: row;
  -ms-flex-wrap: wrap;
      flex-wrap: wrap;
  -webkit-box-pack: start;
      -ms-flex-pack: start;
          justify-content: flex-start;
  -webkit-box-align: center;
      -ms-flex-align: center;
          align-items: center;
  margin: 50px 0 0 30px;
.box {
  width: 100px;
  height: 100px;
  margin-right: 5px;
.black {
  background-color: var(--black);
.white {
  background-color: var(--white);
.orange {
  background-color: var(--orange);
.green {
  background-color: var(--green);
.blue {
  background-color: var(--blue);
.red {
  background-color: var(--red);
.red-200 {
  background-color: var(--red-200);
.black-rgba {
  background-color: rgba(var(--RGB_black), 0.5);
.white-rgba {
  background-color: rgba(var(--RGB_white), 0.5);
.orange-rgba {
  background-color: rgba(var(--RGB_orange), 0.5);
.green-rgba {
  background-color: rgba(var(--RGB_green), 0.5);
.blue-rgba {
  background-color: rgba(var(--RGB_blue), 0.5);
.red-rgba {
  background-color: rgba(var(--RGB_red), 0.5);
.red-rgba-200 {
  background-color: rgba(var(--RGB_red-200), 0.5);
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
    <meta charset="UTF-8" />
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
    <title>Document</title>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css" />
  </head>
      <input type="checkbox" id="dark-switch" name="theme" />
      <label for="dark-switch">Dark / Light</label>
    <div class="color-box">
        <div class="colors">
          <div class="box red-200"></div>
          <div class="box black"></div>
          <div class="box white"></div>
          <div class="box orange"></div>
          <div class="box green"></div>
          <div class="box blue"></div>
          <div class="box red"></div>
        <h1>RGBA</h1>
        <div class="colors">
          <div class="box red-rgba-200"></div>
          <div class="box black-rgba"></div>
          <div class="box white-rgba"></div>
          <div class="box orange-rgba"></div>
          <div class="box green-rgba"></div>
          <div class="box blue-rgba"></div>
          <div class="box red-rgba"></div>
    <script>
      const dark_switch = document.getElementById("dark-switch");
      dark_switch.addEventListener("change", (e) => {
        e.target.checked
          ? document.documentElement.setAttribute("data-theme", "dark")
          : document.documentElement.setAttribute("data-theme", "light");
    </script>
  </body>
</html>
This was an incredible post! Thanks for all this code. I basically copied it all into my own project. For anyone coming here who does have issues, I did have to change one thing. When initially declaring the SASS color variables, you need to wrap quotes around the names like so: $colors-light: ( 'color-primary': #2F302F, 'color-primary-variant': #4E4E4E, – dmikester1 Apr 10, 2021 at 5:14

SCSS / SASS

Advantage: You can just use Hex color values, instead to use the 8 Bit for every channel (0-255).

This is how I did it with the initial idea of: https://codyhouse.co/blog/post/how-to-combine-sass-color-functions-and-css-variables

Edit: You could also modify the alpha function to just use #{$color-name}-rgb and omit the generated *-r, *-g, *-b CSS variables.

Result

body {
  --main-color: rgb(170, 68, 204);
  --main-color-rgb: 170,68,204;
  --main-color-r: 170;
  --main-color-g: 68;
  --main-color-b: 204;
.button-test {
  // Generated from the alpha function
  color: rgba(var(--main-color-r), var(--main-color-g), var(--main-color-b), 0.5);
  // OR (you wrote this yourself, see usage)
  color: rgba(var(--main-color-rgb), 0.5);

Usage:

body {
    @include defineColorRGB(--main-color, #aa44cc);
.button-test {
  // With alpha function:
  color: alpha(var(--main-color), 0.5);
  // OR just using the generated variable directly
  color: rgba(var(--main-color-rgb), 0.5);

Mixin and functions

@mixin defineColorRGB($color-name, $value) {
    $red: red($value);
    $green: green($value);
    $blue: blue($value);
    #{$color-name}: unquote("rgb(#{$red}, #{$green}, #{$blue})");
    #{$color-name}-rgb: $red,$green,$blue;
    #{$color-name}-r: $red;
    #{$color-name}-g: $green;
    #{$color-name}-b: $blue;
// replace substring with another string
// credits: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/sass/str-replace-function/
@function str-replace($string, $search, $replace: '') {
    $index: str-index($string, $search);
    @if $index {
        @return str-slice($string, 1, $index - 1) + $replace + str-replace(str-slice($string, $index + str-length($search)), $search, $replace);
    @return $string;
@function alpha($color, $opacity) {
    $color: str-replace($color, 'var(');
    $color: str-replace($color, ')');
    $color-r: var(#{$color+'-r'});
    $color-g: var(#{$color+'-g'});
    $color-b: var(#{$color+'-b'});
    @return rgba($color-r, $color-g, $color-b, $opacity);

Here is an new answer:

use cross-fade:

background-image: cross-fade(linear-gradient(0, red, red), linear-gradient(0, transparent, transparent), 0.5)
  • linear-gradient(0, red, red) is your color as image
  • linear-gradient(0, transparent, transparent) is an transparent image
  • 0.5 is the opacity you need to config
  • The Old Answer (No Recommand): you can use linear-gradient to hack the color:

    background: linear-gradient(to bottom, var(--your-color) -1000%, var(--mixin-color), 1000%)
    
    $(() => {
      const setOpacity = () => {
        $('#canvas').css('--opacity', $('#opacity-value').val())
      const setColor = () => {
        $('#canvas').css('--color', $('#color-value').val());
      $('#opacity-value').on('input', setOpacity);
      $('#color-value').on('input', setColor);
      setOpacity();
      setColor();
    
    #canvas {
      width: 100px;
      height: 100px;
      border: 2px solid #000;
      --hack: 10000%;
      background: linear-gradient( to bottom, var(--color) calc((var(--opacity) - 1) * var(--hack)), transparent calc(var(--opacity) * var(--hack)));
    #container {
      background-image: linear-gradient(45deg, #b0b0b0 25%, transparent 25%), linear-gradient(-45deg, #b0b0b0 25%, transparent 25%), linear-gradient(45deg, transparent 75%, #b0b0b0 75%), linear-gradient(-45deg, transparent 75%, #b0b0b0 75%);
      background-size: 20px 20px;
      background-position: 0 0, 0 10px, 10px -10px, -10px 0px;
      padding: 10px;
      display: inline-block;
    
    <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
    <div id="container">
      <div id="canvas"></div>
    <input type="range" id="opacity-value" min="0" max="1" step="0.1" value="0.5" />
    <input type="color" id="color-value" />
    This solution badly lacks an explanation and has 2 big downsides: 1. You basically create an image 100 times bigger than your element (the snippet uses different values). And to be precise you actually need to make it 256 times bigger (because there are 256 shades for each 8-bit component) and somehow move it by 100% intervals corresponding to a percent value with 100% shift to the right; 2. It also darkens the color itself as it makes a gradient not only for opacity, but for color as well. So, while being a nice hack, it would be a terrible solution which is hard to get right. – EvgenKo423 Feb 21 at 9:32 for example --mixin-color is transparent, so your-color will linear-gradient to transparent. as long as there is enough space for the two colors to transition, the human eye will not be able to see that they are gradual. So you can switch between your-color and transparent by simply moving background-position – user2053153 Mar 9 at 3:34 --red: rgba(255, 0, 0, 1); --white-low-opacity: rgba(255, 255, 255, .3); --white-high-opacity: rgba(255, 255, 255, .7); --black-low-opacity: rgba(0, 0, 0, .3); --black-high-opacity: rgba(0, 0, 0, .7); div { width: 100px; height: 100px; margin: 10px; .element1 { background: linear-gradient(var(--white-low-opacity), var(--white-low-opacity)) no-repeat, linear-gradient(var(--red), var(--red)) no-repeat; .element2 { background: linear-gradient(var(--white-high-opacity), var(--white-high-opacity)) no-repeat, linear-gradient(var(--red), var(--red)) no-repeat; .element3 { background: linear-gradient(var(--black-low-opacity), var(--black-low-opacity)) no-repeat, linear-gradient(var(--red), var(--red)) no-repeat; .element4 { background: linear-gradient(var(--black-high-opacity), var(--black-high-opacity)) no-repeat, linear-gradient(var(--red), var(--red)) no-repeat;
    <div class="element1">hello world</div>
    <div class="element2">hello world</div>
    <div class="element3">hello world</div>
    <div class="element4">hello world</div>
    You do not need to specify background-size - gradients have no intrinsic size and will automatically stretch as a result. – BoltClock Dec 21, 2016 at 13:50 @BoltClock Yeah, I literally thought of that when I posted it, it was just a bit of playing around in the codepen ;). Cleaned up now, thanks! – roberrrt-s Dec 21, 2016 at 13:51 This is clever, I had not thought of layering solid-color gradients over one another when I answered a similar question last year. This question is probably more general anyway the way it was written, the one I answered was for a very specific use case. – BoltClock Dec 21, 2016 at 13:53 It doesn't really work when the backgrounds are different though, I now assume a white background (255,255,255) when applying the 'opacity'. It could possibly be defaulted to OP's main background color. But then again, white background will probably fit the need of most lighter colors to the extend that people will not notice this. – roberrrt-s Dec 21, 2016 at 13:54 $('button').click(function() { bgcolor = $('#a2').css('backgroundColor'); rgb_value = bgcolor.match(/\d+,\s?\d+,\s?\d+/)[0] $('#a2').css('backgroundColor', 'rgba(' + rgb_value + ', 0.5)');
    :root {
      --color: #F00;
    #a1 {
      background: var(--color);
    #a2 {
      background: var(--color);
    
    <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
    <div id="a1">asdf</div>
    <div id="a2">asdf</div>
    <button>Click to change opacity</button>
    The opacity value will change, so it would be annoying to create a variable for every opacity. – jotch Oct 13, 2016 at 1:00 Is this an attempt at answering the question? Because if so, the code doesn't really make sense. Particularly the rgba(var(--color), opacity) bit. Especially since your custom property value is the entire rgb() notation. But also because of the "opacity" keyword. – BoltClock Dec 22, 2016 at 14:45

    If Relative color syntax is not supported yet you can try:

    Adding Transparency to CSS Colors with JavaScript

    If you want to add transparency to a named CSS color like 'red' or any other color format, you can use a simple JavaScript function like the one below.

    function addTransparency(color, alpha) {
      const ctx = document.createElement('canvas').getContext('2d');
      ctx.setFillColor(color, alpha);
      return ctx.fillStyle;
    

    This function uses the deprecated .setFillColor() method of the Canvas API to set the fill style of a canvas context with the desired color and alpha values. It returns the rgba string value of the fill style, which represents the color with the desired transparency.

    You can call this function with a named CSS color and an alpha value between 0 and 1 to get the corresponding rgba string value. For example:

    addTransparency('red', .1); \\returns rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.1)
    

    Although .setFillColor() is depreciated it is still implemented in some browsers (blink & webkit). If setFillColor() ever gets dropped completely hopefully we'll have Relative color syntax by then.

    Usage with CSS variables

    /* Use the getComputedStyle() method to get the current value of the CSS variables --color and --alpha variable. */
    const color = getComputedStyle(document.documentElement).getPropertyValue('--color');
    const alpha = getComputedStyle(document.documentElement).getPropertyValue('--alpha');
    /* Call the addTransparency() function with the color and alpha values as arguments, and store the result in a variable. */
    const transparentColor = addTransparency(color, alpha);
    /* Use the setProperty() method of the CSSStyleDeclaration interface to set the value of the --color CSS variable to the value of the transparentColor variable. */
    document.documentElement.style.setProperty('--color', transparentColor);
    function addTransparency(color, alpha) {
      const ctx = document.createElement('canvas').getContext('2d');
      ctx.setFillColor(color, alpha);
      return ctx.fillStyle;
    
    :root {
      --color: red;
      --alpha: 0.1;
    body {
      background-color: var(--color);
    
    <h1>Hello World🌎</h1>
    I lost everything I typed Hello and welcome. I suggest you type your answer in a text editor and then paste it in the page to avoid this kind of issues. :) – Eric Aya Dec 29, 2022 at 10:43

    If you love hex colors like me there is another solution. The hex value is 6 digits after that is the alpha value. 00 is 100% transparency 99 is about 75% then it uses the alphabet 'a1-af' then 'b1-bf' ending with 'ff' which is 100% opaque.

    :root {
    --color: #F00;
    #element {
    background: var(--color)f6;
                    Unfortunately, I don't think this works. 8 digit hex code support is starting to spread, but it doesn't look like the trick used with the accepted answer works with them. Example: jsbin.com/nacuharige/edit?css,output
    – jotch
                    Aug 25, 2018 at 23:43
                    As of my posting, this is now available in nearly 94% of currently used browsers [caniuse.com/css-rrggbbaa]. I've gone down this route as all my colour variables were already saved as HEX values, so adding the extra 2 characters to indicate alpha was the perfect solution.
    – Rillus
                    Nov 2, 2021 at 14:27
                    As of 2022 I'm disappointed that it doesn't work. Why does string concatenation like var(--color)f6 not work, but rgba(var(--color), 0.8); does perfectly?
    – Samuel Gfeller
                    Apr 13, 2022 at 12:23
                    This is like applying opacity: 0.5;: it affects the opacity of the whole element, and not only the color of the background. Feel free to edit your message to make it clear.
    – meduz'
                    Mar 12 at 17:42
                    I am unable to hardcode an rgba value, I am using color variables. I should have mentioned I cannot use opacity because I will have a background image that should not be transparent.
    – jotch
                    Oct 13, 2016 at 0:58
                    This isn't a solution b/c if you only want the BG to have transparency but the full element to have opacity then adding opacity to everything isn't helpful.
    – Levidps
                    Feb 6, 2020 at 0:03
            

    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!

    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

    But avoid

    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.