Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Learn more about Collectives

Teams

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Learn more about Teams JSON.NET: Obtain JObject from JProperty Value ...

I read links and digested the above comments and advice. Now I wonder: Is there a good reason why there is no "direct" (i.e., easy) way to turn the Value of a JProperty object into a JObject? It seems like a lot of work to get to a JToken and then have to construct if statements, etc. This isn't to complain about the extra work; rather, it's to admit that I still think I don't understand the true purpose of JToken. At one time, all FedEx packages first routed to Memphis: It seems that all objects can/should go to JToken first then be parceled to the actual target object type. Is that a way to think about it?

In other words, is there ever a good reason to use JToken--or is it just that so many other functions return a JToken and then you have to just deal with that? The JSON.NET manual gives ways to cast JToken to other types ( http://www.newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/Operators_T_Newtonsoft_Json_Linq_JToken.htm ) but doesn't mention going from JToken to JObject...

I find that JObject is usually what I want to have in order to work with JSON and to map from JSON to my .NET classes and back again--as well as doing a host of other operations. I still wonder what is the compelling reason to ever use a JToken object?

JToken represents any possible token in a JSON file. If you have some JSON and don't know in advance what might be inside, you can parse it with JToken.Parse() and get a result as long as the JSON is valid. JObject.Parse() , JArray.Parse() and JValue.Parse() will throw if the root JSON token is not of the expected type. – dbc Jul 5, 2016 at 20:30 To round-out your otherwise excellent summary, what exactly is a JSON token (I for one am still new to JSON)? – Jazimov Jul 5, 2016 at 20:58 From the JSON standard (which is really quite simple), it would be an object, array, value, string or number. – dbc Jul 5, 2016 at 21:01

object : an unordered set of name/value pairs.

array : an ordered collection of values.

value : a string in double quotes, or a number , or true or false or null , or an object or an array. These structures can be nested.

string

number .

JToken is an abstract base class that represents any one of these possible tokens. If you have some JSON and don't know in advance what might be inside, you can parse it with JToken.Parse() and get a result as long as the JSON is well-formed. JObject.Parse() and JArray.Parse() will throw if the root JSON token is not of the expected type. And there is no JValue.Parse() to parse a JSON string you know to represent an "atomic" value, requiring the use of JToken.Parse() in such a case.

Similarly, JToken.FromObject() may be used to serialize any sort of c# object to a JToken hierarchy without needing to know in advance the resulting JSON type. This can be useful e.g. when writing generic serialization-related code.

I don't see the definition of token in the JSON standard you referenced. If a value is a superset of a token (token or true or false or null), why should we care about tokens when parsing JSON? – Alan Evangelista May 24, 2021 at 17:06 @AlanEvangelista - Seems there's an inconsistency in terminology between Newtonsoft and json.org . json.org uses "value" to mean JSON of any type. Newtonsoft uses JValue for a primitive value (true/false/null/string/number), and "token" for JSON of any type. – dbc May 24, 2021 at 17:45

Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!

• Please be sure to answer the question . Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

• Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
• Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers .